|
|
|
|
|
by chmln
2187 days ago
|
|
That document is not particularly enlightening either. > we're removing the types from internal code and making it pure JS. this reduces complexity and helps us ship a faster product Yeah, because dropping static types from 10K lines of code is definitely not going to be a maintenance nightmare in the long run. But perhaps this is something beyond the simpleton comprehension of us novice programmers |
|
My personal experience is that there’s a size threshold where static tying becomes more useful. Below this threshold, the problems solved by static types are still mostly tractable by humans and things like linters. The threshold is different for every program and set of developers.
10K lines is small enough IMO.
> But perhaps this is something beyond the simpleton comprehension of us novice programmers
That’s just flamebait, the comment is better without it.