|
|
|
|
|
by markhollis
2194 days ago
|
|
My analogue design engineer colleague still uses this approach.
One rationale I have heard him say is that he prefers to do things with transistors instead of logic ICs because of the direct availability of transistors, compared to ICs. It's an advantage when doing repair. You always have transistors laying around. However, when you need to repair ICs on a PCB, you need a specific IC doing your function, which you may not have in stock.
I wondering why the argument doesn't apply for transistors. The assumption seems to be that it doesn't matter much which transistors are used. I don't know if anyone can validate what my colleague is saying. |
|
> The assumption seems to be that it doesn't matter much which transistors are used.
Weeell .. sort of, in that the variance is so high that for most designs the parameters are designed to be irrelevant. Provided you get current capacity right. Sometimes you genuinely need matched transistors though.
(One of the classic synths relied on a specific batch of "faulty" transistors, which made its properties almost unreproducible until the full-digital era)