[pphysch]

A mathematician once said something like, "if the solution to the problem in front of you is not obvious, then you are not yet ready to work on it".

Which is to say that intellectual pioneers are often necessarily humble about their achievements, yet worked very hard to get there.

One wonders if it might be the opposite for some founders who were in the right place at the right time to hit the VC/acquisition jackpot.

[mkl]

Your comment is the only Google result for that quote as is, so I'm not sure you have it right. If it were true about mathematics, then it would be almost impossible to work on unsolved problems. Working on the problems is how you become ready to solve them, and for many real world problems it is far from obvious that you have found a correct solution until much later.

[fuzzfactor]

>"if the solution to the problem in front of you is not obvious, then you are not yet ready to work on it".

This could be interpreted favorably toward unsolved problems, which some of us still have thousands of, most of which will remain unaddressed forever.

Any solution requiring significant (or especially massive) effort can most confidently be undertaken the more obvious it is.

To some extent might as well pick an obvious one to invest major effort, where even sporadic progress will at least all be in the correct direction.

It could be good to put a lot of that under your belt to help better approach the less obvious problems, even if there is already an unfair advantage about things which are not so directly visualizable.

There could be unique outcome among your obvious problems if you choose one where others do not see any visible solution at all.

And you can become more ready for things put in front of you.

[pphysch]

Hence "something like". Paraphrasing. The message was conveyed though.

As a trained mathematician it certainly mirrors my experience. Banging away at a narrow problem typically either results in a) no solution or b) enough bullshit to convince everyone that you know what you are doing. The latter is sufficient to carry a career in many branches of pure mathematics.

What usually works better is understanding the holistic environment around the problem, which is not always obvious at the outset, and then the "problem" becomes this little hole in a fabric of understanding and we go "duh" and solve it.