|
|
|
|
|
by ryukafalz
2195 days ago
|
|
You're mixing up section 230 with the situation prior to section 230. There were two important cases prior to its passage: - Stratton Oakmont, Inc. v. Prodigy Services Co., in which Prodigy was found to be liable due to their content moderation, and - Cubby, Inc. v. CompuServe Inc., in which CompuServe was held not liable for content, as they were unaware of it Section 230 was in fact created to change this - to allow companies to moderate without making them liable for all of the actions of their users. |
|