| Summary: Chinese government harass the relatives of the fugitive corruption suspects to force these suspects to return voluntarily. That's definitely one area the Chinese system is vastly behind the international standard. But this has not been conscious to me. When I was a child, we had horror stories of people sentenced to death penalty and were executed on superficial charges that sexual misconduct. And my parents have witnessed detained thief were beaten like wild animals by policeman, and the thief's scream was heart far in the then poor village. These measures can even escalate during "Yanda", a nationally-coordinated clampdown on criminal activities. In [1], it was noted: "China's execution rate increases dramatically during Yanda campaigns." Such brutal national campaigns are dying down, the most recent one [2] has much less cruelty. And historically such campaigns enjoyed universal domestic support. As of today, the Chinese government has a high degree of popular endorsement to use whatever not-too-out-of-line measures to bring back the corrupted businessman or former government officials, who are prosecuted by the public attorneys. Thanks a grain of national pride, i.e., "those corrupted bastard not only embezzled our money, and they escape to the country that is unfriendly and can be benefited from those fortune". [1] https://www.jstor.org/stable/23639486?seq=1
[2] https://www.economist.com/china/2019/02/28/china-is-waging-a... |
I will say... it's curious to me that you seem to be well aware of such practices but still challenged the parent to provide examples (the implication being, that they were misinformed).
Why did you ask the parent to provide examples if you knew of some already? What's your motivation?