Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by mentat 2197 days ago
Do you know of any good writeups for this particular kind of process? I too did fuzzing of network devices before it was called fuzzing and am interested in trying it again with modern tooling.
2 comments

The AFL technical details document[1] is a decent reference for one particular subset of fuzzer feedback: code coverage metrics.

[1]: https://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/afl//technical_details.txt

The electronic design automation world calls it "constrained random simulation" and has been using the technique for two decades for hardware verification, using the same kind of coverage-driven methodology that modern fuzzers use, though in some ways the problem is simpler with a synchronous hardware model where the state space is explicit.