[MaxBarraclough]

Perhaps a relevant comparison here is Pinboard.

It's a paid subscription website and has done very well as a one-man-army project. Its success hasn't compromised its virtues of being lightweight and no-nonsense (unlike Delicious).

If SourceHut could do the same for Git that would be great.

[enriquto]

> If SourceHut could do the same for Git that would be great.

It already does. Other than some (minor) missing features that are in active development, what else do you need?

[MaxBarraclough]

It's a 'public alpha'. Personally I won't be signing up until it's describing itself as stable.

[enriquto]

You can sign-in for free while it is alpha and try it. Everything works very well except the account data export that is not still enabled. I have found it very practical and fast, much better than the typical github+travis combination.

[hoistbypetard]

Their description of "alpha" is more stable than many services that describe themselves as stable, IMO:

https://sourcehut.org/alpha-details/