[umanwizard]

In rust, errors are difficult to ignore (you need to either allow compiler warnings, which AFAICT nobody sane does, or write something like `let _ = my_fallible_function();` which makes the intent to ignore the error explicit).

Perhaps more fundamental: it’s impossible to accidentally use an uninitialized “success” return value when the function actually failed, which is easy to do in C, C++, Go, etc.

[ori_b]

Or .unwrap(), which I see relatively often.

[umanwizard]

That’s not ignoring errors, it’s explicitly choosing what to do in case of one (crash).