|
|
|
|
|
by tartoran
2195 days ago
|
|
No, the abstraction is not literal and not very acurate either but was catchy and implied the control/controlled. You and all of us picked it up without issues. For black people, it may not have gone that well because of the implied meaning and the black history around slavery. Im fine dropping it for a different term |
|
My grandmother from my father's side was enslaved by Nazis not long ago
Master/slave has nothing to do with black people, it was picked up because it was the right terminology for the job.
Master-slave was already in use in Mesopotamia (3.000 b.c.) in religious texts to express the relation between Gods and men.
BTW there have been slaves long after black people were freed in US, for example in Zarist Russia it was abolished in 1861 when half of the population were serves, but it kinda went on the same
In 1915 Nikolai Berdayev (a russian philosopher) wrote
> “Russia is a country of unbelievable servility and terrible humility, a country lacking any consciousness of the rights of the individual, and which fails to stand up for the dignity of the individual…”
There have been slaves in USSR
There were slaves during Franco dictatorship, that lasted until 1975
There are slaves in many third World countries right now in the form of forced labour, forced sexual exploitation, forced marriage and forced relocation
Thinking that slavery is a monopoly of black people from US is a form of cultural appropriation itself.