|
|
|
|
|
|
by LudwigNagasena
2200 days ago
|
|
|
Originalists and textualists would interpret “sex” the same way. Unless you think that Civil Rights Act of 1964 implied protections for gay and transgender people in that very time and was misinterpreted by everyone (which is very unlikely). The people who support the idea that “sex discrimination” can be interpreted as including gay discrimination and trans discrimination adhere to “loose constructionism” and think that constitution and laws can change their meaning without being formally updated. |
|
|