[bokwoon]

I also think 'main' branch makes more sense, but GitHub is breaking away from an entire collective body of tutorials out there that already reference the 'master' branch. All for the sake of PC and a knee jerk reaction to a recent event. What will people think of this change 5 years on?

[mcv]

I think in 5 years everybody will be used to it. Tutorials will have changed by then and everybody will eventually forget that this was ever an issue.

I'm don't think it's a necessary change, but I also don't think it's a harmful change.

[wayneftw]

GitHub is not Git.

If the Git cli tool still initializes a new repo to 'master', I'm not going to go out of my way to rename it before I push to GitHub.

I haven't seen any discussion around changing the Git cli tool.

[j-james]

I have: https://public-inbox.org/git/4c08e1a0-db64-5d7d-493f-54c68ee...

[mcv]

I don't think git bans you from using a master branch, does it? It's just that their default has changed. But any other branch name will still work.