|
|
|
|
|
by cjhanks
2198 days ago
|
|
I agree with the notion that artificial intelligence is a graph of smaller problems, as is human perception. The problem is a question of informational density. Biological systems are computationally very dense. Far more dense than the 4nm transistor fabrication available today, and with a far larger volume of size. Consequentially, the computational capability of most AI systems is far lower than its biological equivalent. And as you find in most information finite discretization problems - the lower density information system will alias against the higher information system. So, that means you will have a hierarchy/pipeline of computational stages - each aliasing reality. Eventually, you will find that your parameterization of each perceptual stage has a strange property. The size of each subsequent layer is important... but the relative computational space of each subsequent stage is even more important. Because mismatched stages results in nothing but numerical interference and noise. And I think that is where we are today. The IQ of a krill shrimp. |
|