|
|
|
|
|
by jerf
5568 days ago
|
|
"If we mandate competition, it's not a FREE market." In addition to the other fine replies made, I want to highlight this to strongly disagree with it. In fact actually having a free market requires aggressively protecting it when a given market naturally coalesces into a monopoly or oligarchy. Trust-busting isn't an anti-free-market position, it's a pro-free-market position. The anti-free-market actions come from governments picking winners and enshrining monopolies/oligarchies through regulatory capture. In particular, when advocates of other social organizations level this as a criticism of free market, my response is to point out that when you have lack of mandated competition with some form of government-selected winners, be it communism, socialism, or "crony capitalism", you don't have a free market at all and the criticism is more generally applicable to the social organization being argued for by the person raising this criticism. In a free market, a new company always ought to be able to come along and completely destroy an existing company if they do a good enough job. If you don't have this, you don't have a free market. |
|