|
|
|
|
|
by VLM
2197 days ago
|
|
Lets say they want to raise premium revenue by 25%. The solution will be to increase premiums on smokers, because everyone hates smokers, by 25%. How does that math work, you're asking? Right now you and I can check "non-smokers" on medical documents. And that's true, at least for me, medically speaking. However after we fuse all sources of data we can punish everyone. I bought two packs of cigars in the 90s when I was a dumb young kid. Medically speaking a quarter century later I'm a non-smoker from a health perspective. However, from a revenue generation perspective... Big brother is not going to fund this out of the goodness of their heart to be revenue neutral or (gasp) positive for the public. The only purpose for this expensive initiative will be to screw over the general population even more to increase income inequality a little more and make the rich just a little richer. |
|