|
|
|
|
|
by insertUsername2
2204 days ago
|
|
I agree that policy could have an effect. But it does not explain all of it. For example, I do not think that "the wealthy" could make slavery fashionable in a medium, lets say two generations time frame. This is because we have, at least in most places, accepted on a cultural and moral level that slavery is deeply wrong. I do realize that you can argue with eg. cases in Bangladesh or children in African cobalt mining, but to bring back slavery in Europe or the US would take a massive cultural shift over generations. |
|
That sets the tone and the public support for the direct actions to come next. Have increasingly severe punishments for minor crimes. If any politicians speak out against it, run ads describing them as "weak on crime". If necessary, invent entirely new crimes to target the groups that you want to target.
Now you have a captive population, and public support for punishing them. Since the framework emphasizes individual actions and individual "debts", there is no backlash in having that population work while captive.
Slavery is deeply wrong, and exists in the US today through the prison system.