| Open Source Hardware is not limited to just the PCB design. Here is an excerpt from the definition provided by OSHWA [1]: > Open Source Hardware (OSHW) is a term for tangible artifacts — machines, devices, or other physical things — whose design has been released to the public in such a way that anyone can make, modify, distribute, and use those things. Wikipedia's article on Open-source hardware has the following statement [2]: > Hardware design (i.e. mechanical drawings, schematics, bills of material, PCB layout data, HDL source code and integrated circuit layout data), in addition to the software that drives the hardware, are all released under free/libre terms. I don't want to speak for anyone else, but my hope is that the ecosystem around FPGAs, including the VHDL/Verilog, toolchain, design and manufacture, will all be free/libre so that the underlying chips will be treated as commodity. Even if the chips themselves need massive infrastructure to create, if they're treated more like a fungible commodity then we could see 'clones' pop up and not be so dependent on a select few companies. In terms of DIY manufacture, I think Sam Zeloof has been doing some "Homemade Silicon ICs" [3] but I don't have a good sense if that will ever catch on or be within reach of the average hobbyist. Maybe a bit off-topic but @ico_TC has this to say on Twitter about it [4]: > I had discussions with 4 different FPGA vendors. For them it does not make sense to invest cash in improving the open source toolchain, as it does not sell enough additional chips to justify the cash investment. [1] https://www.oshwa.org/definition/ [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open-source_hardware [3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XrEC2LGGXn0 [4] https://twitter.com/ico_TC/status/1269155001999507456 |
In the case of FPGA boards, OSHW would thus require "mechanical drawings, schematics, bills of material, PCB layout data, and integrated circuit layout data" given that no HDL source code is present in it.
Seems like I have been a little loose in my description, but at least I did not completely miss the point. Accuracy is however needed, I'll try to find another formulation or link to the pages you sent for people to see that it is a little more complex!