|
|
|
|
|
by bailey1541
2207 days ago
|
|
So much of this is commentary by people who have never worked at a successful startup that grows from zero to 100M+. Purists who would do well with a union and have never felt what it is to be part of a core team that brings something from zero to changing the world. They focus on questions like what has the company done for me? And ignore the basic tenets of employment. Go work for a 10,000+ company with that attitude. 1) Decide if this company is in this category (you’re proud to be part of it and think it can change the world);
2) Decide if you are someone who is capable of doing this (it’s a huge commitment, are your ready and able to be a world changer?);
3) Determine if you’re in an early enough group to justify this commitment (~first ten? 20?); and,
4) Set reasonable parameters around checking in / email to be available in an emergency, but otherwise are on holiday (i.e. if it’s not an emergency / meeting agreed upon emergency requirements, you’re on holiday and not working)
— you’re not just answering questions via email). Above all, say what you mean (I will / will not do this) and do what you say. For context, I’m founder of three startups collectively >$500M exits. And any first five-ten employees who didn’t understand the above would have a short tenure. They’re simply not startup material. That said, we strive for 40-hour weeks, we take evenings and weekends off, and we expect all statutory holidays and personal holidays off — always with the caveat that if the fit hits the shan, we’re all available to band together and solve the problem. |
|
Any boss who makes these demands does not understand how employee burnout effects the long-term health of the company and does not value your role enough to safeguard the contributions you make through well-managed redundancy plans.