|
|
|
|
|
|
by bogomipz
2200 days ago
|
|
|
Yeah, no. In civil discourse you give people the benefit of the doubt that they weren't doing something for nefarious purposes but that they maybe made an honest mistake. In this case it was simply a copy paste error which they pointed out. They apologized because they were being civil and polite not out of some admission of guilt. Somehow you were the one that missed all of this. I think you can see what others thought of your tone as well. Both of your comments here come across as very angry. |
|
|
Right and life went on before you decided to play "hero".
> They apologized because they were being civil and polite not out of some admission of guilt.
But you told him not to apologize. So that means you told him not to be civil? Also, it's not polite to speak for others as it isn't part of civil discourse.
> I think you can see what others thought of your tone as well.
Others? Just you. And it's rather childish to "appeal to downvotes".
> Both of your comments here come across as very angry.
"Yeah, no."
Listen, the only one causing drama here is you. I made one innocuous and helpful comment. The guy responded and everything was settled. The conversation had nothing to do with you and yet here you are.