|
|
|
|
|
by jowiar
2196 days ago
|
|
I’ve found boring in this context to be a function of 3 things (in no particular order):
- Your experience using the tool in question to solve this problem or very similar ones
- Your teammates’ experience using the tool in question to solve this problem or very similar ones
- The world’s experience using the tool in question to solve this problem or very similar ones The specific drivers of this tend to be a mix of problem-solving pattern matching ie “Hey, we know what the usual suspects are know when things are slow/crash”, and ecosystem robustness — what is the probability of you being the first to trip a bug in a dependency / has a library been used to solve 10000 problems or just 3 — It’s more likely that APIs have been sorted out, bugs have been closed, etc. or that your team knows the quirks. As an example, OCaml might be a relatively boring choice for writing a theorem prover, but for something like a RDBMS-backed web application, things are a lot more “interesting” as you go off the map much sooner. |
|