|
|
|
|
|
|
by 2ion
2210 days ago
|
|
|
> Devils advocate: it is plain weird for every app I install to have so much file system and system access. It’s nice to have a sandboxed solution built in. It would be nice if it was a solution that didn’t have the problems that this article listed, but snaps could be adapted to be good with a few changes. Exactly. Personally I have been sticking my desktop programs into "firejail"-managed "containers" for a long time. It's a good thing that a similar solution has been implemented that is suitable to bring this too the masses. |
|
|
Couldn't you just make a "default-firejail" package that installs the symlinks to firejail somewhere that's before the default install install location in your path? And maybe consider installing that in the base install, but that potentially risks breaking things unexpectedly for users.