[nettdata]

Security isn't something you just bolt on after the fact, it's part of the design, and involves so much more than just code.

If they failed to take security into account in the early stages, never mind implement it at the beginning of development, then odds are they won't be implementing it effectively any time soon, especially with the rate at which they'll be expected to keep growing and adding functionality.

This kind of issue that they're showing now could (and probably should) have been detected and handled early on, even with a simple third-party code review.

And the fact that they are as big as they are, and growing as quickly as they are, means that they should have an increased sense of responsibility when it comes to security and protecting their users.

[j2d2j2d2]

The existence of one bug doesn't imply complete disaster everywhere. It should be treated as an anecdote. Good science demands it.

Good science would also suggest Tumblr should get some experts to help them discover anything else that might be lingering, which they're planning to do. Much like a peer review process.

Your attitude is important for those in the security industry as it pushes things forward, but remember that not everyone has the time to spend on it that you might. It can either be an asset or the bane of your existence. As an asset, you get paid for the things you understand because others don't. As the bane of your existence, you fight society for not knowing what you know.

Tumblr is hiring. Maybe you should apply and help them fix it?

[nettdata]

To be clear, I didn't suggest a "complete disaster everywhere". That being said, you can tell a lot about the state of the nation by something rather simple and isolated as what they've experienced here. There are some rather simple best practices that probably should be employed that apparently are not, and even a cursory review probably would detected it.

I was, more than anything, responding to the parent's post regarding "they can just add security later" idea.

It's true that I tend to work on projects where security is a huge deal (online banking, government, global video game services including in-game payments, etc). As the architect of these systems, a key part of the design is security, and while other projects don't have to be quite as diligent, that doesn't mean they should just ignore it altogether.

I'd also like to hope that my attitude is not just for those of us in the security industry, but for everyone making web-based applications.

Personally, I think any online service does their current or potential clients a disservice if they don't take security into account early on.

As soon as you take money from someone, I consider that to be a responsibility that has been accepted to not only provide the functionality you offer, but to do it in an appropriately secure manner.

It's the classic techie vs. sales guy argument; we don't want it perfect, we want it on Wednesday.

The problem is that if even simple and effective security is overlooked or not dealt with early on, you'll almost always be forced to accept a compromise rather than take the required time to implement it properly.

As to the job, I'm already quite busy, thanks. Between implementing Oracle clusters and my new startup that's just closing on our financing, I've got my plate full.

Besides, I hate PHP. ;)

[j2d2j2d2]

I think this touches on PHP's real security issue.

It's easy to get going quickly but becomes an issue fast. Smart people tend to move away from PHP, but startups find this difficult.

Hiring is then an issue and the bad practices persist.

[nettdata]

With all due respect, I'm not sure I buy that "hiring is an issue" argument.

You don't need someone full-time to help develop best practices, help design or architect code/systems, or to do code reviews.

Any startup that gets funding should, in my opinion, get a short-term consultant to come in, take a look around and offer suggestions and advice. Even if it's just for a day. These are resources that have been there, done that, and wouldn't be interested in a full-time gig with the company to begin with. Even if the company could afford them.

Hopefully this isn't too far off topic, but it's something that I see missing from a lot of clients that I get called into. (Not saying these guys haven't done this, either.)

I think there's a lot of value for a startup to validate their work with outside help, especially if they're relatively new to the game. Even if it's just pointing them to some articles or reading for them to follow up on, or just mentioning ideas of things they should look into; it can prove to be huge.

For instance, I'm currently mentoring a few developers/teams on a part-time, couple hours a week basis. Some of it is just being available on MSN to answer a quick question every now and then, other times it's doing a couple code reviews. Other times it's grabbing lunch/beer with them to discuss the concepts of things like how to implement continuous integrated testing, or managing other processes, or discussing new tech that they've heard of. For the most part, they're not paid gigs either. I enjoy helping people do stuff well, and the little bit of good faith help usually leads to some good future work.

Sometimes all it takes is asking the right question to get them to think about things in a different manner.

The last gig I got was for a major video game company. The job involved a .NET stack, which I knew nothing about and had never worked with, not even a little bit. I got the job despite that fact because in the interview I asked them general (admiteddly leading) questions, such as "how are you handling _____, or what is your plan for _____". Even though all of my experience had been in non-MS tech stacks, the technical director that was interviewing me was furiously taking notes. It was clear that they hadn't planned for some of the things I was mentioning, never mind thought of them. But once they heard the question, it was painfully obvious they should have. As a result, a 3-day consulting engagement turned into full-time for two years.

In my case right now, I've sought a mentor in some new tech I'm working with in my current startup. It's allowed me to hit the ground running, and take advantage of their experience. A half day one-on-one made all the difference for me, and will drastically improve the quality of what I'm doing.