[abathur]

Kinda funny, I guess.

This is one of those instances where I might care about the case Konnikova was making if she bothered using any quantitative methods to convince me the humanities were awash in quantitative study while qualitative analysis clearly went the way of the dodo. Or that literature programs were churning out students who think network analysis is the best way to understand a text.

In the purely-qualitative realm, it just comes off as pearl-clutching over something I don't think anyone actually believes?