[dirtydroog]

It's so sad to see the BBC caught up in all this. It used be a reputable news source, the BBC World Service was just that - listened to the world over.

Now it's this.

[robocat]

The BBC has a bias, so what? They usually get their facts straight, and sometimes the spin is not to my liking, but that doesn’t mean it is poor journalism.

[detaro]

What do you mean by "caught up in all this"? It shouldn't report about this happening? You don't like some wording they use?

[dirtydroog]

It's very clearly anti-Trump (I live in the UK). As for the article, there's this part:

"The president was criticised for ordering authorities to forcibly remove peaceful protesters from a square outside the White House so he could cross the street to take a photo in front of a church."

Wasn't it the AG that ordered the protesters to be moved?

Either way, who cares. This is HN, not reddit (although sometimes I wonder)

[moistly]

> Wasn't it the AG that ordered the protesters to be moved?

(A) Barr denies it.

(B) The buck stops at the President's desk.

[davmar]

I think your delicate opinions will be more comfortable on gab instead of HN or reddit. Bye.