|
|
|
|
|
|
by rolph
2208 days ago
|
|
|
re garding the CIA comment, there are core values that are exactly opposite of what was stated. Candor is a fundamental quality for any CIA associate
you should be upfront and open about what you want and expect. Recognition of the potential for positive contribution by any and all people, some volunteer this willingly, some must be managed into such a contribution or placed in a context that creates positive results from seemingly negative actions. |
|
|
A person who is truly honest and open will fail to be a spy as he will reveal the true nature of his intentions way too easily. To succeed against foreign opposition you must be deceptive. To be deceptive means you cannot have candor. If the CIA requires candor as a fundamental quality of any associate then that means they require associates to have qualities that set them up for total failure.
Instead the unstated but obvious conclusion that can support two seemingly contrasting requirements to be a successful agent is this:
What the CIA truly values are people who are good at deceiving the organization itself into thinking they are honest and have candor.
Honestly, I don't think anything I said in this post is true.