Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by mindcrime 5577 days ago
Most of that sounds pretty good, but I have to disagree with this bit:

Ask yourself: would you sell your company? Would you sell it for $20 million? If you answered yes, at this stage, find a new idea. You don’t love it enough.

That strikes me as an over-generalized view. Different people have different circumstances that are going to affect that decision. Somebody who has already had a successful exit and is already set financially, or someone who is very young, might have a different threshold for when they would or wouldn't sell, versus someone who's older and who has never had an exit.

In my own case, as a 37 year old who's never had the "big exit" I can say that there are few - if any - ideas that I wouldn't sell for $20 million (assuming I owned a significant chunk of equity at exit and was going to be walking away with multiple millions of dollars personally.)

Sorry, but the chance to assure myself of financial independence now and for the foreseeable future, and to buy myself the ability to work on whatever I want in the future, could conceivably trump my allegiance to pretty much any idea I might be working on at the moment. I'm not saying it would necessarily be a slam dunk decision, or a decision I'd make on the spur of the moment... but it would be awfully tough to say no to an exit like that, knowing that I'm not getting any younger, and that another chance might not come along.

That said, if I were running a company, and owned enough equity to maintain control, and had to face that decision, I would say "no" if I believed the $20 million exit was far less than what we would eventually achieve, and/or if staying the course were the right thing to help more of the founders / early employees ultimately realize their own degree of financial freedom.

3 comments

I'm broke and my company is not growing. I believe that a large contributing factor to the failure of my company was that we went in to it with an exit in mind instead of a love for our product.

Would we have sold our company for $20 mil? Hell yes. But we went in to Y Combinator excited about an exit and we stunted the growth of our company by shooting for dollars instead of stars.

This is a serious question, so please don't take it as snark or mockery: Wouldn't shooting for dollars increase the growth of your company? Or at least get it ramen profitable so it can't die/fail?
You're right – I used colorful, imprecise language. Yes, you should try to make your company profitable. I'm speaking in the context of exits.
I don't think he's saying selling is bad... but that the goal is to build something great. If you believe in it and are driven by your vision of making it great and you succeed, people will want to buy it. Then you'll have options.

If the goal is just to build something that will get bought, you might be able to get... stressed and frantic about that. But you usually won't have the same type of passionate, intrinsic motivation that drives founders who are in love with their idea.

If the goal is just to build something that will get bought, you might be able to get... stressed and frantic about that. But you usually won't have the same type of passionate, intrinsic motivation that drives founders who are in love with their idea.

Fair enough, and I agree with that. I don't want to "build a company to flip," but if - in the process of building what I hope will be a billion dollar company - I get an early / unexpected chance to walk away with a nice chunk of bank; it would be hard to turn down. That's all I'm really getting at.

I definitely see that... turning down a big offer wouldn't even be smart in some cases. And even for those who want to "change the world" there may be a point where the money just makes too much sense to walk away from...because you may KNOW you could make a difference in another way with $20million.

I also think a lot depends on how you're wired. I'm relentless & tireless when I believe in what I'm doing and good things tend to happen when I'm in that space. But I can't see myself getting there from a starting point built only on $$$.

viz. Bill Gates, who is changing the world and doing good in more tangible ways than almost any startup, despite having built up Microsoft with the clear focus of make money and dominate the market first, change the world later.
Let's be fair to Microsoft--their mission statement was "a computer on every desk and in every home, all running Microsoft software". By the time Gates stepped down as CEO, they achieved that. For all its flaws and the sorry state it finds itself in today, Microsoft was more worldchanging than most startups.