[null_object]

There have now been several articles documenting the attacks that have been the consequence of questioning Tegnell's decisions in public. This is one example (in Swedish)

https://www.aftonbladet.se/debatt/a/kJr5b6/jag-anklagar-er-f...

But in DN (behind a paywall) there have been other articles where those that questioned Sweden's policy have even been personally threatened.

Tegnell has been wrong about pretty much everything - from saying that the pandemic had reached its "peak" in Sweden when we had 137 cases[1] to being consistently wrong about how far we've supposedly come with 'herd immunity' - which was supposed to be around 50% by the beginning of June, but which has shown itself to be only around 7-10% in the worst-affected areas in Stockholm.

There is also a lot of finger-pointing in articles and comments by Swedes, accusing other Nordic countries of purposely under-estimating their covid figures - whereas the actual statistics[2] show that Sweden itself is the only Nordic country with massively under-estimated deaths.

[1] https://www.aftonbladet.se/nyheter/a/RRpj0A/statsepidemiolog...

[2] https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/04/21/world/coronav...

[jojje2k]

Regarding [1], it sounds more like Aftonbladet is either misquoting him, quoting out of context or The title claims he said we had reached the peak, giving the impression of peak infections across the whole population, but the contents only covers a specific group of people who had returned from their vacations in Italy.

I'm not saying he didn't mean or say peak total infections in the interview. I'm just saying that particular article is all over the place.

Edit: On the contrary, according to the article he said we could very well be hit by a new wave from new arrivals.