[loulouxiv]

Well if healthcare professionals are trained to interpret study, and separate the wrong from the useful stuff I guess it won't be so hard for The Lancet to hire some of them to review papers... I tend to believe Didier Raoult when he says in his last interview that anybody who works in medecine could easily tell this paper smelled really fishy, and I am sure it would be less costly for The Lancet than the reputation loss they are going to suffer.

[devin]

You act as if highly-trained professionals don't ever disagree.

[notahacker]

Most professionals found Raoult's own published claims of the 100% cure rate of hydrochloroquine combined with azithromycin based on small groups without proper controls fishy, for a start.