[DiogenesKynikos]

> Because that claim is nonsensical and defies common sense, whereas the idea that an accidental infection took place is entirely reasonable and requires no leaps of faith whatsoever.

Only because of your political biases.

> unless you consider the idea that the Chinese dictatorship tried to obfuscate and cover up the truth about such a theoretical accident

This is how I know your views are driven by your political biases.

[kspacewalk2]

I'm sorry, this is a little unclear. The idea that a lab having an accident is reasonable because of my "political biases"? Are Chinese labs any different from Western labs, where this would also be entirely possible?

Or is it calling the Chinese dictatorship a dictatorship that's supposed to show my supposed "political biases"? I didn't realize pointing out directly observable facts has become so politically charged and controversial.