Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by rorykoehler 2213 days ago
For that to work it needs to be one person one profile with real identities. No bots.
2 comments

To be anonymous is necessary for free speech. You should never confuse social media for the public opinion.
What we have now is a DDOS on free speech. How to solve it?
A DDOS is an attack because it removes resources. Other people having opinions that disagree with yours isn't removing resources from you.

Whether it's newspapers or a town square, there have always been people who have been loud. Loud does not mean right. It also doesn't mean you need to muzzle the people who are loud.

1 person can be millions of people online. Based on your response I don’t get the perception you understand the gravity of the problem we are facing.
Who is we? And why is that a problem?
"One person, one vote." There's probably an analogous argument to be made regarding speech online, ie. "one person, one account on platforms critical to democratic discourse".

I agree with you that anonymity is important too though.

Fortunately, there are ways to ensure data came from an original source without actually disclosing that source's actual identity.

This will probably require considerable mobilization of tech companies, governments, and citizens, but I think democracy and free speech online is important enough to warrant the effort.

Facebook can verify identities and keep you outwardly anonymous.
That might be easier to do with a national ID system, and maybe a government ID attestation service... just to be thorough.
Why? We have sufficient ways to ID.