|
|
|
|
|
by dredmorbius
2214 days ago
|
|
My point, such as it was, is that at present the workfactor penalty favours less-effective crypto, the opposite of the suggestion. Of course a specifically-implemented timeout might be incorporated. That faces the challenge of bad actors (or incompetent / unaware ones) bypassing such a mechanism. Incorporating the cost into the algorithm itself (say; requiring, more rounds based on time since first release, according to a mandatory and well-estabished protocol, just off the top of my head, with both client and server agreeing on minimum required rounds) might work. |
|