Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by paulryanrogers 2214 days ago
Perhaps USB-C is considered more modern or convenient
3 comments

It has USB-C charging as well. I think that's sort of the best of both worlds, it's not like a barrel connection adds much to the board, and it means you can run it from a much less complex power supply.

It does mean it has an extra port that you might find unnecessary, but at the kind of prices they're selling this at including a usb-c charger would actually add a fair bit to their costs, and you can buy an aftermarket one pretty easily.

USB-C means that I get to use any charger I have and can trivially replace it; a barrel-connector is some one-off component that is precious: if I lose it or damage it I am _screwed_.

The article says the device also support some charging over USB-C... why even bother including a barrel-connector? It feels wrong.

universal PSUs with all of the few common barrel connector sizes are commonly and cheaply available. I personally prefer USB-C too, just because I have more devices with it, but barrel connectors aren't that weird.
It's cheaper to get some replacement barrel-connector cables then USB-C
I doubt relatively flimsy and tiny USB-C connectors will hold up to the same kind of abuse as a big robust barrel plug.

No one seems to complain about their 120/240 mains plugs not being "modern" either...

> No one seems to complain about their 120/240 mains plugs not being "modern" either

Those plugs are standardized. I can use them with a Dell laptop, an Apple desktop, and a VIC-20 from 1982, with zero difficulty. If there were exactly one barrel plug (per country) that worked on everything, you'd see a lot less interest in ditching it.