|
|
|
|
|
|
by rini17
2209 days ago
|
|
|
Code that violates C++ static typing rules can be syntactically valid too, yet noone is proposing it should be only a warning. (I find this the most weird thing about C/C++ culture: they are so proud it is static typed, yet oblivious to all the other problems and traps/memory unsafety/undefined behavior/etc.) |
|
|