|
|
|
|
|
|
by XCSme
2207 days ago
|
|
|
I noticed this is actually mentioned in the article at the end as a bonus section. In my case `optional` did seem to work better. I didn't encounter the empty page flash he mentined. LE: I don't have that problem because I don't use async CSS. I didn't even know that was a thing, why would you use JavaScript to make sure the browser doesn't wait for the CSS to load? If JS is disabled you end up without any styles or have to add a noscript fallback. Also, why would you let the browser render FOUC? |
|
|