|
|
|
|
|
by ritikm
2206 days ago
|
|
> YC once tried an experiment of funding seemingly good founders with no ideas. I think every company in this no-idea track failed. We were a no-idea company in the S12 batch. We ended up starting Streem [1], which was acquired by Box in 2014 [2] and ended up integrating and becoming Box Drive [3]. While we didn't build an enduring company, I'd say it was a moderate success by some metrics. YC had two no-ideas in S12 and another one or two in W13 before they shut the track down. Unclear if that's enough data to spot a trend, but YC is smart and likely had other data to back up the decision. Looking back, it was a painful process to go from "no idea" to what eventually became Streem. I don't think I'd ever go and decide to start another company without an idea in the future. [1] https://lifehacker.com/streem-offers-unlimited-cloud-storage... [2] https://venturebeat.com/2014/06/16/box-acquires-streem-so-yo... [3] https://www.box.com/drive |
|
Borrowing from epidemiology, I think "no ideas" might be an effect modifier. That is, it is just an intermediate step when going from the exposing factor to the outcome (the outcome, we know, is failing start-ups). It would be interesting to know what the real proximal cause is, or at least a really good proxy for it.
Maybe YCombinator could benefit from the input of a biostatistician or similar statistical expert to design some cohort studies on start ups.