|
|
|
|
|
by swampplanet
5574 days ago
|
|
No its not. Right now our corporate tax rate is 2nd only to Japan. What is happening is corporate flight from the US. I get emails every day proclaiming the low tax rates of Costa Rica and Panama. Heck even the UK's rate is almost half the US. Ad to that certain states like California and New York. So not only do the wealthy get taxed personally but also on their businesses. This is double taxation. When the top 5% of the population pay over 80% of the taxes it is ludicrous to say they have a low tax burden. This doesn't even get into the question of lower taxes for capital. Perhaps if we looked at the entitlements which are growing all the time as this article points out, we would see why the tax burden is too large for everyone. (well not the 50% who pay no taxes at all). The real deficit debate is how big of a government do we need not if the rich are paying their fair share. That debate is over, they pay more much more than their fair share. |
|
Also, the "Fair Share" thing is tough. I would argue that "Fair Share" should relate to the percentage of the country's wealth or economy controlled by the tax bracket, rather than the percentage of the population or even the percentage of yearly income represented by that group. Looked at that way, the upper brackets are getting a great deal.
Point taken on size of government. If you just believe the government should be smaller, then there is no reason to revert to historical mean taxation rates. However, my sense is that our social indicators for poverty, education, and health are so bad relative to other countries that it's hard to make the case that the status quo is adequate, much less excessive.