|
|
|
|
|
by chris_f
2209 days ago
|
|
Not the poster, but here is an example. Elsewhere in this thread I posted a fact that I knew, but wanted to double check. It was about the LexisNexis news database containing 35k sources. Here are the queries for "lexis news 35000" on Google and DDG: https://www.google.com/search?q=lexis%20news%2035000 https://duckduckgo.com/?q=lexis+news+35000&ia=web The information I was looking for is in the first Google results. I didn't see it on the first page of DDG at all. This was just my last search as an example without even trying too hard to come up with one. I like DDG, but Bing (where the majority of DDG's organic results come from) is not as good as Google for organic web results IMO. |
|
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=lexisnexis+35000+news+sources
You have trained Google to recognise Lexis as an alias for LexisNexis. DDG does not offer that, so one has to spell it out explicitly. You have to decide whether it's acceptable for you to change habits back to the common ground for Web searching.
The value provided by magic intent recognition (as opposed to traditional searching for keywords) differs from person to person. On the whole, it's likely for the better and that's why that feature was implemented at Google, but I have also read countless complaints about it on HN because situationally it pollutes results and can't be turned off.