[pedrocx486]

I remember seeing somewhere recently that they had 8% market share while MS Edge after the update managed to reach almost 7%.

I'm sure it's a good idea to shift from Firefox and let Microsoft and Google duke it out /s

The reason they fell apart as a Browser IMO was letting Firefox get "old" UX wise, while Chrome felt VERY user-friendly (I mean to the common enduser, not people like us here on HN).

[Sir_Substance]

It was partly that, but they also dropped the ball on their core demographic.

Things like pushing mandatory updates via "experiments", shoving pocket in everyone's faces, killing XUL.

I can't remember what it was they did that was the final straw for me, it was at least 4 years ago and not even that big a thing. What I remember is going "well, there goes my last shred of hope. Mozilla officially doesn't understand why their core advocates prefer them over alternatives. Might as well move to vivaldi and at least get all them sweet chrome addons".

Mozilla forgot about their "whole-of-product quality". Their brand was "secure, private, power-user oriented". They've been slowly cutting bits off for years that impact those aspects, and somewhere along the line they passed a threshold were they weren't sufficiently more secure, sufficiently more private or sufficiently more power-user oriented than competitors. No one change was at fault, but they've diluted themselves too much now. They're no longer the staunch defender of non-corporate internet ideals they used to be, and without that, they sorta...don't matter.

[thatguy0900]

I'm curious what percentage of users actually purposefully change browsers. I always assumed Firefox fell apart due to Googles heavy Chrome advertising on every Google property combined with some webmasters also throwing up download Chrome here error pages. Not to say that a better ui wouldn't have helped