Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by lucianf 2213 days ago
Point taken. Every time Oracle is mentioned it's in the context of horror licensing stories. I get that - but would it make a difference if I said OCI is actually different?

Take this with as much salt as you want but they're really trying to put that in the past. OCI pricing is super transparent, simple metrics, cheaper than the incumbents on every front, there's no "call us for pricing", there's a transparent 30% discount for committed spending (before you even get to talk to a salesperson) and the dev team has been given free reign to act like a startup and ignore the corporate machine. I'm not a marketing person but I do believe we have a very good offering and it's a shame it's being ignored solely because of bad blood.
2 comments
lucianf 2213 days ago
Another point re $$$'s. Predictable, low pricing is actually a key Oracle cloud selling point. Following the recent wins with Zoom and 8x8 we've put up a comparison sheet [1] and a workload estimator [2]. Then there's the general cost estimator [3]. No hidden costs, and no calling required.

[1] https://www.oracle.com/cloud/economics/

[2] https://www.oracle.com/webfolder/workload-estimator/index.ht...

[3] https://www.oracle.com/cloud/cost-estimator.html

link
nikau 2210 days ago
Not a shame.

You have a company that charges licenses based on the physical core count even if you run the product in a VM using only a single core, but then they also want to be your cloud supplier.

The only strong point of Oracle is legacy product lock in, you would be crazy to pick them for any new initiatives.

link