|
|
|
|
|
by zachware
2212 days ago
|
|
The risk is that it behaves like a reinforcement learning algorithm which essentially rewards itself by making you more predictable, I'd argue that's what curated social networks do today. If you're unpredictable you're a problem. Thus, it makes sense to slowly push you to a pole so you conform to a group's preferences and are easier to predict. A hole in my own argument is that today's networks are incentivized to do increase engagement where a neutral agent is in most ways not. So perhaps the problem isn't just the need for agents but for a proper business model where the reward isn't eyeball time as it is today. |
|
But you are predictable, even if you think you are unpredictable, you are just a bit more adventurous. Algorithm can capture that as well. It will be easier for algorithm that works on your behalf.