|
|
|
|
|
|
by yjftsjthsd-h
2223 days ago
|
|
|
> the way they handled Reiser4, Tux3 and Reiserfs Reiserfs is in-tree. Reiser4 failed after losing its lead dev, but my impression was that it was on-track to become the next Linux filesystem of choice. I have no clue about Tux3. > Basically, any filesystem not made by the filesystem establishment (and their friends) gets bullied. Linux has XFS from IRIX and JFS from AIX; the only way to have that and a "filesystem establishment" conspiracy is to resort to no-true-scotsman. > Of course, the only filesystems they can make are all crap like ext4 and btrfs. I'll agree that BTRFS is ... suboptimal, but what do you have against ext4? I'd like it to have data checksums and maybe CoW, but it's been the workhorse of the Linux world for ages and performs quite well, and even has some nice new features like encryption in recent times. |
|
|
Yes it is, but it got bullied either way. Linux filesystem devs made incompatible changes to it against the ReiserFS teams' wishes, breaking it. IIRC it had to do with ACL support.