|
|
|
|
|
|
by ferzul
2216 days ago
|
|
|
isn't: let x = 1:x
cyclic, but without closure? unless closure is so broad as to capture essentially any haskell value. it's not going to be obvious when there is a cyclic reference (e.g. if you use `let x = repeat 1` instead of the definition above) |
|
|