|
|
|
|
|
by tialaramex
2220 days ago
|
|
An idea: Most sites, certainly consumer sites, which offer WebAuthn it's very optional. So doing it the current way just adds a step after the password step. You need a (perhaps stolen) password to even find out there's a next step and you're not in after all. But if we swap it, now we're telling bad guys if this account is protected up front. "This one is WebAuthn, forget it, same for the next one, aha, this one asks for a password, let's target that". The people with WebAuthn are no worse off that before, maybe even arguably better in terms of password re-use - but everybody else gives away that they aren't protected. |
|