|
|
|
|
|
|
by zokier
2219 days ago
|
|
|
It is fast hash sure, but it still only sits in the middle of the pack in smhasher results, which is not very impressive. The code is maybe bit simpler than some of its competition, but to my non-expert eyes its still not trivial, and the compiled code still seems as big as some of its competitors. Although I'm bit curious why there is no "size" result in the smhasher table for this hash? http://rurban.github.io/smhasher/doc/table.html The ecrypt result is completely irrelevant when this can not be in any way be considered cryptographically secure at this point. |
|
|
for all hashes. lot of those top ones are not crypto hashes.
> The ecrypt result is completely irrelevant when this can not be in any way be considered cryptographically secure
Break it first, then you can say that. otherwise, what would you know?
not sure if it's because English is not your first language or just had a grumpy day or something else, this came across veeery negative. Be positive in your comments on work.
if you want to be critical doing so with positivity gives it more credibility because it shows you're able to see both sides. leading people to assume you're more likely making a balanced rather than a biased assessment, whether or not that's true.