[dntbnmpls]

> bought the largest King Salmon from there

That's easily a few hundred dollars just for the salmon. Maybe over $1000 depending on the size of the salmon.

> He ate it that night but still ended up going to Apple.

No way he ate it all that night. Family friend brought us a whole king salmon from a fishing trip. Lasted a few meals. The best salmon I've ever had. Nothing like the farmed atlantic salmon you get from the supermarket.

[chooseaname]

>> He at it that night...

> No way he ate it all that night.

He ate it does not necessarily imply he ate it all. I ate chili last night, but that doesn't mean I ate all the chili.

But, anyway, those weren't the actual words of Forstall in the video.

[dntbnmpls]

> He ate it does not necessarily imply he ate it all.

But it implies it.

> I ate chili last night, but that doesn't mean I ate all the chili.

That's a bit different isn't as you are referring to a general unquantified food ( chili ) as opposed to a quantified amount of food ( one whole salmon ). What if someone gave you a bowl of chili and you ate it. Most people would assume you ate it all. Because it's a singular item like a whole salmon. Someone game me a bag of chips and I ate it. "All" is implied. Someone gave me a hershey's bar and I ate it. Most would assume they ate it all.

Also, you are missing my point. My point is that most people don't appreciate how big salmon actually are and also how expensive they are. I didn't realize how big they got until someone gave me a whole salmon. My intention wasn't to start a petty semantic argument.

[dota_fanatic]

Hopefully a professional chimes in but I believe it does imply that he ate it all. Your example isn't one to one because you refer to it as "I ate chili" instead of "I ate it". Same way people wouldn't be confused if he had said, "He ate Salmon that night but" .

Similar examples: I painted it last night. (Painted a painting) I beat it last night. (Beat a game) I ran it last year. (Ran a marathon)

"Where's the chili?" "Oh, I ate it last night, sorry." (Ate the chili)

"Mmm, this chili is good, isn't it?" "Sure is, I had some last night." (Ate some of the chili)

[foldr]

You are right. Eat is generally considered to have a telic (<- technical term) reading when the object is definite. (See e.g. https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=deEUDAAAQBAJ&lpg=PA71&ot...)

[chooseaname]

"Half my chili is gone!"

"Sorry, I ate it."

Edit:

"This chili is no good!"

"What's wrong with it, I ate it?"

[dota_fanatic]

"Half my chili is gone!" "Sorry, I ate it."

"it" in that construction means "half my chili". Just as in "My southern, three-day-cooked chili is gone", "it" is "(their) southern, three-day-cooked chili".

"This chili is no good!" "What's wrong with it, I ate (some of) it?"

The parenthetical is omitted but implied. Unless they're referring to the chili that is inside your digestive tract?

[sgt]

Agreed. I found the story plausible except that Scott Forstall singlehandedly ate an entire king salmon in one night. /s