|
|
|
|
|
|
by komali2
2224 days ago
|
|
|
> You have to start by even coming to agreement that less "freedom" (and one should probably qualify that---freedom from what, freedom to do what) for more GDP, more safety, more prosperity is a bad thing. We don't have to agree at all. It is a bad thing. If you think trading freedom for the right to more plutocrat oversight is good, what's the point of even discussing at all? |
|
|
Consensus; same as always.
And cross-pollination of ideas.