[hadtodoit]

Many people actually survive on that one check. Alaskans are fiercely independent for the most part, and those living outside the main cities are typically self-sustainable. They own their land, hunt for their meat, grow their veggies, trade for what they don't have, and spend whatever money they do have on the essential tools to sustain that.

[gowld]

> trade

That's income, even if it's not denominated in dollars.

Presumably they also own land and a house, which is wealth.

The point behind the UBI concept that it does it's thing even if you have no income because you love somewhere where you can't farm your own food and have your own land with your own house in it.

[Ididntdothis]

You need a lot of available land to live off the land. This may work in Alaska but in other states this can’t be done on a large scale.

[hadtodoit]

You really don't need much land to get by. Alaskans who are self-sustainable usually have small greenhouses they only farm in during the summer months. In a place like California where you can grow things year round, a quarter acre plot would be plenty for a whole family. Thanks to marijuana farms, indoor hydroponics equipment can be had for cheap. If you have a space to setup, you can grow fresh vegetables indoor year round.

[HideousKojima]

How would that work in a city where an acre costs millions?

[hadtodoit]

Unlikely that someone paying a million an acre would want to hunt for their meals. Alaska works because people are self-reliant but community bonds are incredibly strong. Beyond a certain population density, that type of community doesn't work.