|
|
|
|
|
by balfirevic
2221 days ago
|
|
> The language is starting to show some warts due to inheriting bad decisions from former language maintainers (nullable value types and nullable reference types being treated completely differently). That's being a little too harsh, in my opinion. Even if you were designing both kinds of nullable types right now, it'd be difficult to have them behave the same way without adding runtime support for keeping track of nullability of reference types. And that's quite a big task. |
|