[reaperducer]

Are we playing "what censorship is OK censorship" now?

No. It's a game that was played out long ago by responsible organizations. It's just that the tech industry is stumbling upon it these days.

For example, responsible media outlets don't publish information about rape victims or suicides unless there is a compelling public interest.

[pgeorgi]

And it even varies by culture. US media reporting on crimes in Germany tend to get confused (to the point that at least once they suspected some public cover up attempt) that they won't get the names of arrested suspects - that's part of our approach to privacy here, while apparently having the names out is considered a mechanism against misconduct by the police in the US (at least that's how it was explained to me when I asked why the names are always public).

I can follow both arguments but there's only room for implementing one in any given society. Societies overlapping like they do now (thanks to globalization and, to no small part, the internet) doesn't make that easier.

[throwaway511543]

I mean going by a lot of American's perception, only the US way is the correct way, so it must mean that Germany is doing some form of cover up! To make things even better, Germany should ditch its civil law for common law! /s