|
|
|
|
|
by mehrdadn
2217 days ago
|
|
I'm confused, what exactly is incorrect? I said if we don't have more realistic benchmarks then I wouldn't just assume it's faster. Now you're saying you did in fact do more realistic benchmarks, and you found lower entropy ones to exhibit the same performance (which is not faster). They all seem consistent with each other? I also said that sorting is often more complicated than just comparing integers by their values, which you didn't really address except to mention doubles, which missed the point I was making (I was trying to say sorting often needs e.g. satellite information). In any case though, if you've done other benchmarks, it'd be nice if you could post them on GitHub or something. Maybe I'm missing something. |
|