[ckastner]

> When people do this it comes across as malicious harassment rather than a genuine legal complaint for harm caused. Why so many jurisdictions, and why on the very day it came into effect?

The very day should be obvious: because these companies had two years to prepare for and become compliant with the GDPR.

This wasn't Facebook et al. saying "oh no, we need more time please'. This was them saying "we made up our mind on the implementation; if you disagree, we'll let a judge decide."

No idea about the jurisdictions, but I'd expect there to be good reasons, too. He's an activist, but I never perceived him as an over-the-top "in-your-face" activist. On the contrary.